is widely regarded as a crown jewel, primarily due to its meticulously crafted, refined, and intricate features. Building a collegiate soccer dynasty demands sustained excellence, but securing top talent year after year is a monumental task, especially for smaller schools seeking to bridge the gap and compete with powerhouse programs.
Constructing College Football Champions requires a strategic approach. We’ve compiled a comprehensive guide on how to elevate your recruiting game and attract top talent from across the country.
Fortunately, it’s unnecessary to manually analyze your team’s performance, as there are more efficient ways to identify areas for improvement. To optimize recruitment efforts, dedicate a significant portion of your time to the Crew Wants spreadsheet, accessible via the Recruitment menu when using the correct stick input.
This display helps identify which positions are currently filled on your team roster, and which ones may require additional players due to existing seniors or players expected to declare for the draft. The text allows insight into the number of gamers at each location in your prospect list, as well as how many you’ve already secured commitments from this season? While it’s not necessary to only recruit for open positions, those roles should still serve as the foundation of your recruiting efforts each season. They are especially crucial during the offseason, when the transfer portal comes into play. —
As summer’s warmth begins to wane, a renewed sense of optimism sweeps across the nation’s soccer landscape, fueling anticipation for a more promising season ahead – one that will showcase the talents of top recruits who barely gave your program a second glance last time around. During the pre-season, you’re granted additional hours, making it an ideal time to make significant progress. Rethink your strategy to attract top talent by targeting the number eight-ranked prospect and taking calculated risks on highly touted recruits that align with your team’s needs and values. While the likelihood of matching is slim, a fortunate coincidence might arise where a few players align perfectly with your programming.
While hope is essential, it’s always prudent to prepare for the unexpected, making a solid contingency strategy your best insurance policy. As you navigate the recruitment process at a larger institution, it’s likely that highly sought-after prospects will have their sights set on programs with more established reputations and prestige, making it challenging to secure top talent for your own program. However, this does not necessarily mean you should not pursue them for a reasonable period of time. —
I am currently managing my NCAA Football 14 Dynasty file with the University of New Mexico, which initially starts as a one-star program in its entirety. There are only a handful of four-star prospects willing to grant me an audience, and even fewer five-star prospects deign to acknowledge my existence.
During the preseason recruitment phase, I follow this strategy: Identify every top-tier recruit who will listen to me, and offer scholarships to those I desire to join my team. As the season commences, many of these talented individuals inevitably fall off my radar due to their having already committed to more prominent institutions that dwarf my own program in terms of resources and reputation. However, this also yields the crucial portion: Identifying the top underserved students that elite institutions overlooked.
It’s straightforward: in Week 0, I filtered prospects into “five-star recruits” and “four-star recruits”, then sorted them by scholarship offers received. In cases where you’ve supplied a prospect, we indicate “Y” if you have; conversely, we note “N” when you haven’t (with the number of total offers in parentheses), seeking a zero result. Every elite recruit without exception is receiving guidance from me.
With this approach, I have consistently secured at least four four-star recruits across each of my first three recruiting cycles at New Mexico. As the recruiting cycle progresses, I complete my class by targeting a mix of three- and two-star prospects, yet securing overlooked elite recruits makes a significant difference. —
The recruitment system features a valuable tab that highlights suggested targets based on game intelligence. What players currently possess a ranking of their top ten or planned objectives within the existing states. By identifying a straightforward approach to identify top recruits to complete my class later in the recruiting cycle, I’m likely to overlook this option initially, waiting for significant time prospects considering my university – but I’ll probably find them regardless. —
Pipelines play a crucial role in collegiate recruiting, as each college and its coaching staff rely heavily on them to identify top talent. Primarily, pipelines offer additional incentives for recruiting candidates from specific regions across the country. Use this! When considering equal circumstances, investing time in a candidate from a pipeline region tends to yield a higher return due to the mere efficiency gained. While not excluding potential recruits from non-pipeline regions, it’s wise to prioritize areas where you’ve already established a presence, just as one would in real life.
In New Mexico, I prioritize recruiting top talent from within the state, followed by top performers in neighboring Texas and California who may not be receiving adequate opportunities from major universities in those regions. I frequently select top gamers from diverse states, but this is where most of my successful recruitment campaigns originate from. —
With limited weekly hours devoted to recruitment efforts, and even more constrained when considering the smaller size of a small college, What do you mean by “them”? As a recruiter, I focus intently on securing maximum available hours with my top-tier prospects – the coveted four- or five-star recruits – pouring every available resource into those efforts until they’ve made a commitment to my institution or reached their decision-making threshold, effectively “locking in” their college choice. During this period, I shifted my focus to three- and two-star recruits, dedicating countless hours to scouting and evaluating their potential.
Once you’ve established a strong connection with a recruit, you’re presented with the option to “Strategically Advance” or “Thoughtfully Elevate.” This allows you to craft a targeted approach, emphasizing three key aspects that warrant further consideration. When a programme’s unique selling points align with a recruit’s top considerations – as verified by the ‘test mark’ indicator on the recruiting tab – it becomes an ideal match. When you’re well-positioned to champion their goals across all three priorities with prompt action, this strategic approach can have a profound impact on your recruitment efforts. If their schedules do not coincide, you may find yourself devoting more time to alternative pursuits. —
With the freedom to scout recruits, you can delve deeper into their attributes, uncovering valuable insights that aid in your decision-making process. Upon thoroughly scouting them, the game will reveal whether each prospect is a gem (denoted by a green gem icon), a bust (marked with a pink X symbol), or somewhere in between. Viewing a gemstone’s performance as equivalent to a star score placed above its ranking, and conversely, considering a bust as any outcome that falls short of this standard. A three-star gem is akin to a high-potential football recruit, while a three-star bust is comparable to an underwhelming prospect.
The timing of scouting efforts relies heavily on the underlying system and the number of recruits needed at a given time; in my case, playing as New Mexico, I have never encountered a four- or five-star recruit through scouting. Even when they’re unsuccessful, these individuals can still contribute to the success of my program. I meticulously scrutinize every three- and two-star prospect on my radar to increase the chances of identifying hidden gems. While attempting to scout during the preseason is ideal, I’ve had to adjust my approach, targeting four- and five-star prospects by mid-season to make the most of my limited available hours.
Here’s the rewritten text:
A notable exception to this rule is the Nintendo Switch Portal, where scouting gamers is not recommended. As a consequence of their established reputation within faculty, there isn’t the mystery surrounding their credentials as there is for high school players, and their listed star rating accurately reflects their true standing. No rare or special items are available through the Nintendo Switch’s Portal. —
The Switch Portal is arguably one of the most valuable tools in the recruitment process. At the end of each season, dissatisfied gamers have the opportunity to jump-start their careers by entering the Transfer Portal, gaining access to a wide range of teams across the country, including yours. While adding a few key players via free agency can add depth and bolster your roster, it’s not a reliable solution for filling all the gaps in your team; ideally, a well-rounded approach that combines savvy drafting with strategic FA signings yields the best results. The talent pool emerging through the annual Switch Portal is impossible to predict, and their potential greatness remains uncertain.
When evaluating the Portal, it’s generally more effective to focus on identifying top-tier talent within your reach, including potentially a third- or fourth-string player who can contribute in multiple positions, rather than banking on landing a guaranteed starter who underperformed at their previous collegiate program? —
Visits prove to be an extremely effective and crucial recruitment tool, becoming accessible once a student has included your institution among their top five options. Consider extending an invitation to join us on campus for our home game day? During their tenure, you can request that they focus on a specific aspect of your program. When choosing an ideal class for someone, consider selecting one that is crucial to their growth and has a corresponding tick mark on their scouting report. It’s also advisable to choose an area where you excel, preferably with a grade of B or higher.
While regular visits can foster strong relationships with new hires, executing these meetings effectively requires attention to several subtleties. Should you lose a key player the week they’re scheduled to visit your recruitment pitch may fall flat. By scheduling multiple gamers to attend at the same time, you can potentially reap complementary bonuses or incur conflicting penalties, depending on the specific circumstances. When a quarterback and a wide receiver duo excel in Week 8, they’ll often publicly laud each other’s performance, fostering a sense of mutual respect that can only boost their collective confidence. When multiple prospects, such as three cornerbacks, schedule visits at the same time, their interest inevitably wanes since they perceive you’re not as invested in each individual’s unique qualities.
Despite the inherent imprecision, visits remain a crucial yet uncertain component of the recruiting process, warranting a deep understanding and proficiency. —
While a misinformed recruit may occasionally cause problems, this is by no means the primary source of difficulties. For many students, a single factor stands out as the ultimate game-changer in their decision-making process: their Dealbreaker. This crucial consideration can be anything from a campus’s location to its academic reputation. Some Dealbreakers are surprisingly malleable – the likes of Enjoying Type, Enjoying Time, and being a Championship Contender can shift significantly over the course of the season. Once a student-athlete has committed to a program, any prior “dealbreakers” no longer apply, allowing them to reconsider and officially decommit in favor of signing with their new preferred institution on National Signing Day.
Similarly, I awarded scholarships in advance to a group of top recruits, prioritizing those with Championship Contenders as their non-negotiables. As the season progressed, my Championship Contender ranking initially remained robust, but ultimately fell short of expectations, leaving me effectively frozen out. Despite this, none of the colleges offered scholarships to these recruits; therefore, I kept their profiles on my board as a contingency plan. As National Signing Day approached, I anticipated that some prospective students would commit to attending my alma mater despite our institution not aligning with their top choice. As we move on to the next phase of recruiting, I’ve successfully brought in diverse new prospects despite their reservations, having earned their trust by establishing a connection before they arrived at university. —
For additional guidance, explore our resources for newcomers, master the art of throwing a precise contact cross, and put our recommendations to the test by selecting the optimal pipelines.